• Tweet

  • Post

  • Share

  • Save

  • Get PDF

  • Buy Copies

  • Print

AUG15_11_08106798602_vert

Over the years, I've asked hundreds of executive students what skills they believe are essential for leaders. "The ability to give tough feedback" comes upwardly frequently. Only what exactly is "tough feedback"? The phrase connotes bad news, similar when yous have to tell a team fellow member that they've screwed upwardly on something important. Tough also signifies the mode nosotros think nosotros need to be when giving negative feedback: firm, resolute, and unyielding.

Just "tough" also points to the discomfort some of us experience when giving negative feedback, and to the claiming of doing so in a way that motivates change instead of making the other person feel defensive. Managers fall into a number of mutual traps. Nosotros might exist aroused at an employee and utilise the feedback conversation to blow off steam rather than to coach. Or nosotros may delay giving needed feedback because nosotros anticipate that the employee volition become argumentative and pass up to accept responsibility. We might try surrounding negative feedback with positive feedback, like a bitter-tasting pill in a spoonful of honey. Merely this approach is misguided, considering we don't want the negative feedback to skid by unnoticed in the honey. Instead, it's essential to create conditions in which the receiver can take in feedback, reflect on information technology, and learn from it.

To get a feel for what this looks like in practise, I juxtapose 2 feedback conversations that occurred following a workplace disharmonize. MJ Paulitz, a physical therapist in the Pacific Northwest, was treating a hospital patient one day when a swain staff member paged her. Following procedure, she excused herself and stepped out of the treatment room to respond to the page. The colleague who sent it didn't reply her phone when MJ called, nor had she left a message describing the situation that warranted the page. This happened two more times during the same treatment session. The 3rd time she left her patient to respond to the page, MJ lost her cool and left an angry voicemail message for her colleague. Upset upon hearing the message, the staff member reported it to their supervisor equally abusive.

You and Your Team

  • Giving and Receiving Feedback

    Make delivery–and implementation–more productive.

MJ's first feedback session took place in her supervisor's office. She recalls, "When I went into his office, he had already decided that I was the person at mistake, he had all the information he needed, and he wasn't interested in hearing my side of the story. He did not address the 3 times she pulled me out of patient care. He did not admit that that might have been the fuse that set me off." Her supervisor referred MJ to the human resources department for cosmetic action. She left seething with a sense of injustice.

MJ describes the subsequent feedback conversation with man resources equally transformative. "The woman in HR could see that I had a lot of just-under-the-surface feelings, and she acknowledged them. The way she did information technology was genius: she eased into it. She didn't make me go offset. Instead, she said, 'I can only imagine what y'all're feeling correct now. Here you lot are in my office, in corrective activity. If information technology were me, I might be feeling angry, frustrated, embarrassed… Are whatsoever of these true for you?' That fabricated a huge deviation."

With trust established, MJ was ready to take responsibility for her behavior and commit to changing it. Adjacent the 60 minutes person said, "Now permit's talk about how yous reacted to those feelings in the moment." She created a space that opened up a genuine dialogue.

The subsequent conversation created powerful learning that has stuck with MJ to this mean solar day. "Oftentimes when we're feeling a strong emotion, nosotros go down what the 60 minutes person called a "cowpath," because it's well worn, very narrow, and always leads to the same place. Let's say you lot're angry. What do you do? Y'all accident up. Information technology's okay that you experience those things; it'due south only not okay to blow up. She asked me to think almost what I could do to get on a different path."

This article also appears in:

"The feedback from the Hour person helped me learn to find the space betwixt what I'm feeling and the side by side affair that slides out of my oral cavity. She gave me the opportunity to grow internally. What made information technology piece of work was establishing a safe infinite, trust, and rapport, and then getting downward to 'you need to change' — rather than starting with 'you demand to change,' which is what my supervisor did. I did demand to change; that was the whole point of the corrective activity. But she couldn't showtime at that place, because I would accept get defensive, shut downwardly and not taken responsibility. I still to this day recollect that my co-worker should have been reprimanded. But I as well ain my part in information technology. I see that I went down that cowpath, and I know that I won't do it a 2d fourth dimension."

The deviation in the two feedback sessions illustrated higher up boils down to coaching, which deepens self-sensation and catalyzes growth, versus reprimanding, which sparks self-protection and abstention of responsibility. To summarize, powerful, loftier-impact feedback conversations share the following elements:

  1. An intention to aid the employee grow, rather than to prove him he was incorrect. The feedback should increase, not drain, the employee's motivation and resources for modify. When preparing for a feedback chat as a manager, reflect on what you hope to achieve and on what bear upon you lot'd similar to have on the employee, perhaps past doing a brusk meditation merely before the coming together.
  2. Openness on the function of the feedback giver, which is essential to creating a high-quality connection that facilitates change. If yous start off feeling uncomfortable and self-protective, your employee will match that free energy, and you'll each exit the chat frustrated with the other person.
  3. Inviting the employee into the trouble-solving process. Yous tin can inquire questions such every bit: What ideas do you lot accept? What are you lot taking away from this conversation? What steps will yous take, by when, and how will I know?

    This article likewise appears in:

Giving developmental feedback that sparks growth is a critical challenge to master, because it tin can brand the difference between an employee who contributes powerfully and positively to the organization and i who feels diminished by the organization and contributes far less. A unmarried conversation tin can switch an employee on — or close her down. A true developmental leader sees the raw material for brilliance in every employee and creates the atmospheric condition to let it shine, even when the claiming is tough.